Veerappa Moily opens a Pandora's Box - Instablogs
Veerappa Moily opens a Pandora's Box
Sreeja , Mumbai: Sep 14 2009
Made Popular Sep 15 2009
India :

Veerappa Moily opens a  Pandora's Box

Indian Law and Justice Minister Veerappa Moily deserves moral support from the honest people of this country for his bold initiative to revisit the constitutional provisions, including Article 311, which work as a shield for government officials accused of corruption. The minister is reported to have sought Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh’s support in this regard.

All right thinking people, who dream of a corruption-free India, should come forward to wholeheartedly support Moily who appears to have opened a Pandora’s Box by taking initiatives to revisit constitutional provisions, including Article 311.

Government officials, especially the top brass including IAS and IPS officers, have been the curse of this country for long as they are neck-deep in corruption. And they escape the law at all the time as the law is framed in favour of the government babus. It is decades since we heard of an IAS or IPS officer punished for his or her corrupt practices. And it is a naked truth that corruption has become a norm rather than an aberration in this country.

Moily’s assertion holds significance as it comes a day after Chief Justice of India (CJI) KG Balakrishnan’s statement that sanctions to prosecute government officials were not always forthcoming. In reply to the CJI’s comment, the Union minister said that prior sanction should not be needed to prosecute a public servant in a corruption case.

Veerappa Moily opens a  Pandora's Box

Moily has suggested that in cases where there was direct or overwhelming evidence as with officials caught red-handed accepting graft, prosecution should be swift. He said the criteria for accepting sanctions need to be redefined.

What works as a stumbling block in prosecution is the controversial single directive issued during the tenure of the United Front government during 1996-98 that made sanction mandatory for prosecuting officers of the rank of joint secretary and above.

Moily’s initiative is based on the Santhanam Committee on corruption which had said that Article 311 is open to conflicting interpretations in courts and that these loopholes are exploited by accused officials to delay the trial against them. He stated that all such loopholes, whether in law or precedents declared by courts, have to be plugged.

Whether Moily succeeds or not in his efforts to revisit the laws which work as a shield for government officials accused of corruption, but has surely succeeded in floating a debate in the country on the need to rein in the corrupt babus.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Ejazur Rahman NA
Kolkata, India
Mr Moily wants to do right things for this nation, but his pursuit is misleading. IAS and IPS are not the kingpin in this game. Mr Moily must address the root cause of this mess of corruption. Firstly, he should target the breeding ground which generate all sorts of corruptions. The standing committees and sanctioning authorites are the main culprits. If any department gets its financial sanction/approval 5 or 10 times more than what is originally required by providing false exaggerated technical or non-technical nomenclature to the conniving authorities then the so-called CORRUPTION has to take place. Now Mr Moily must understand where these IAS and IPS people fit in.
Add your Comment